In the practice of medicine, one generally prefers time tested proven path while treating and trying to prevent diseases. An innovation is usually expected to pass the test of time. The three approved COVID-19 ワクチン, two mRNA vaccines and one genetically engineered adenovirus vector DNA vaccine, are based on concepts and technologies that have never been used on human beings in the past (though few are approved for use in veterinary medicine). Inactivated vaccines stood the test of time for more than half a century and played key role in control and eradication of many infectious diseases. Were the disadvantages of good-old time-tested method of active immunity development through inactivated vaccines comprising of killed or attenuated germs heavy enough to discard altogether to opt for technologies that were never used on humans before? Apparently, the extraordinary situation presented by the pandemic seems to have superfast-tracked testing and use of the emergent, high potential vaccine and therapeutics development technologies which otherwise would have taken several years to see the light of the day.
承認された19つのCOVID-XNUMX ワクチン 現在、当局によって設定された優先事項に従って、パンデミックと戦うために大規模な免疫プログラムの下で英国の人々に投与されています
- BNT162b2（Pfizer / BioNTech製）：a mRNAワクチン、ヒト細胞におけるウイルスタンパク質抗原の発現に関するメッセージを運ぶ
- mRNA-1273 (manufactured by Moderna): a mRNA ワクチン act in the same way as above
- ChAdOx1 nCoV-2019（by オックスフォード/アストラゼネカ）：基本的に、 DNAワクチン、遺伝子操作されたアデノウイルスをベクターとして使用して、獲得免疫発生の抗原として作用するヒト細胞で発現する新規コロナウイルスのスパイクタンパク質遺伝子を運ぶ
上記のXNUMXつすべて コロナ ワクチン are expected to induce active immunity against novel coronavirus. The process of immunity development (both humoral and cellular) begins following exposure to antigens. In the case of mRNA ワクチン, this happens after viral spike proteins are expressed in the human cells following injection of the vaccine containing viral messenger RNA. In the case of other, immunity development happens after expression of coronavirus DNA incorporated in the adenovirus. One may argue that these ワクチン それら自体は抗原ではなく、ヒト細胞でウイルスタンパク質に翻訳されるまで免疫応答自体を引き起こすことができないため、厳密な意味で真のワクチンではありません。 ワクチンは、定義上、能動免疫の発達のプロセスを引き起こしますが、これらXNUMXつのワクチンの場合、ウイルス遺伝子がタンパク質に翻訳され、それが抗原として機能するまで待たなければなりません。 これらのXNUMXつの承認されたワクチンは、これまで人間に使用されたことのない技術に基づいています。
In the last five decades or so, ワクチン have played key role in dealing with prevention of several infectious diseases (except malaria). The time-tested gold standard was to use killed inactivated germs or germ parts as vaccine. It almost always worked. This is how several infectious diseases were controlled and some eradicated too in the past.
If the current pandemic had struck humanity say a decade ago, we would still have used the good old time-tested ワクチン made using killed germs but science has progressed much in the recent past. Advances in molecular biology of genes and its potential applications in therapeutics and vaccine development coupled with encouraging results on animal models meant saying goodbye to the existing method of inducing active immunity by exposing to weakened antigens. The idea of tricking human body to produce the viral proteins in the cells that could act as antigens for initiation of antibody formation against the self-manufactured viral proteins is sleek and smart and may be the beacon of future days to come. Just that neither mRNA nor genetically modified adenovirus has ever been used on human beings to trick the body to induce active immunity. Of course, there is first time for everything new. Yes, may be in the peacetime after studying impact for little longer period including on vulnerable population.
True, these new techniques are answers to some of safety issues like reversion risks, unintentional spread or production errors etc associated with the olden types of ワクチン. Plus, new methods are better targeted – specific antibody against specific viral antigen. But someone missed to take note of something that everyone knew that this pandemic is due to coronavirus, a virus that has a recent history of several epidemics in the past two decades, and a virus known to be notorious for rapid mutation because of lack of proofreading nuclease activity, thereby implying viral antigens are not going to remain static structurally for a long period of time. Apparently, this is what the situation looks like now.
Yes indeed, clinical trials were successfully done for viral gene-based ワクチン which proved safety and efficacy well within the permissible range. The same applies to the traditional whole virion inactivated COVID-19 vaccine as well whose initial efficacy of about 70% in trial in Brazil was brought down to 50.7% after some volunteers developed mild symptoms. But then whole virion inactivated vaccines are known to elicit mild reactions due to its very nature, possibly a trade-off for active immunity against wider range of antigens.
The performance data of the three approved ワクチン in the UK, especially pertaining to level of protection provided to the vulnerable people would tell the deeper story in future. For now, if the choice of a vaccine comprising of a wide range of antigens derived from killed inactivated virus may have been better for effectiveness over a longer period of time is in oblivion. May be, for vulnerable people viz. for those at higher risk due to advanced age or comorbidities, quick induction of passive immunity through 中和抗体 そうでなければ健康のためのより良い選択肢と能動免疫経路だったかもしれません。
どうやら、パンデミックによって提示された異常な状況は、そうでなければ日の目を見るのに数年かかったであろう、緊急の、潜在的なワクチンと治療法の開発技術の超高速のテストと使用を持っているようです。
***
DOI： https://doi.org/10.29198/scieu/210101
***
